He's talking about using burst on a refclock. The problem is that this is a logical extension of the purpose of burst to a realm where it has not been implemented. There is no "downside" as one will cause no extra traffic; the intente would be to "listen to more frequent answers".
For some refclocks this make sense (as they may provide timestamps once per second), and I believe Dave has done some work on handling this case for some refclocks. H _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
