ega wrote:
this might be due to bug 571, see https://ntp.isc.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=571 which was introduced in ntp-dev-4.2.0b-20060123 ...
I think this bug does not apply in this case for two reasong: First, I am using "ntpdate [EMAIL PROTECTED]:4.2.0a+stable-2-r". Second, ntpdate is correct in refusing to sync from an unsync'd clock. Cheers Daniel -- Refactor, don't archive! - SamHasler - 28 Aug 2004 - twiki.org _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
