[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > David, > > RFC 1305 was the seat of furious controversy. I consider the only > authorative document is in PostScript, later in PDF. The IETF and I > have engaged in serious disagreement on PDF formats as against Postel > ASCII. Everything, and I mean everything today is in PDF - Governent > documents and forms, University documents and forms, IEEE standards, > ACM and IEEE publications and everything else I do is in PDF. So, > what you see is what you get. The PDF of RFC 1305 is on the NTP > project page. > Dave
Thanks, Dave. I see that reference 25 points to: Abstract: http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/database/rfc/rfc1305/rfc1305a.pdf Body: http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/database/rfc/rfc1305/rfc1305b.pdf Appendices: http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/database/rfc/rfc1305/rfc1305c.pdf On page 11 of the body, the word "precision" is used in the context where I would use "resolution". It isn't used in the sense of "how close to the correct time is this clock", which I might call accuracy. Perhaps it would be helpful to have these terms defined somewhere? Perhaps the terms are used differently by different cultures, even! Cheers, David _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
