On Feb 16, 8:20 am, "Ry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there still an effort to product an RFC for NTPv4 underway? Or do > the SNTPv4 RFCs suffice for describing the protocol (leaving the core > clock algorithms up to the implementation)?
Whoops... I wrote that too soon. I found it on your udel pages. This is the correct link, right? http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/database/reports/ntp4/ntp4.pdf Or is it this one? http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntpv4.txt _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
