Hal Murray wrote: > I >> I don't know; it seems to me better for the refclock driver to specify a >> default set of comm parameters that will work for the "standard" device >> that refclock supports, but have a universal mechanism that would allow >> overriding those params from the config file and would work for any driver. > > We are probably having a violent agreement. > > I'd like to be able to say "Z3801A" rather than whatever line > settings it actually uses. > > I'd also like to be able to specify the raw line details in > case I find a box that is close enough but uses some strange > line settings. (The Z3801A is a good example. That was the > only change it took.) >
Yup, we're on the same page. John _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions