Unruh, I really don't want to prolong ths discussion other than to correct factual errors. NTP handling of leap seconds does nothing like you suspect. Please see the document on leap second handling linked from the NTP progject page linked from www.ntp.org.
Dave Unruh wrote: > (snip) > > Using the Linux adjtimex system call which has the ability to change the > ticksize which gives much greater than 500PPM slew rate for the clocks. > ( Up to 100000PPM, although that is never used. ) And as I understand it, > your handling of leap seconds in ntp also uses far greater than 500PPM slew > rates. > _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
