[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Danny Mayer) writes: >David L. Mills wrote: >> Danny, >> >> Unless the computer clock intrinsic frequency error is huge, the only >> time the 500-PPM kicks in is with a 100-ms step transient and poll >> interval 16 s. The loop still works if it hits the stops; it just can't >> drive the offset to zero. >> >> Dave
>Yes, I found this out when my laptop stopped disciplined the clock and >was complaining about the frequency limits and I started digging into >the code to figure out why. Why can't it drive the offset to zero? 100ms should take about 5 min(if it were always 500 but the loop would make it take longer) _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
