On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 12:30 PM, David L. Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The iburst option is by serious intent not the default becaase serveral > thousand ibursters ganging up on one or another NIST and/or USNO public > servers would not be considered polite.
I agree, which is why I was challenging Steve's "always use iburst" advice. I think Steve's advice should have read: "Server lines should always use iburst if they refer to your *own* servers, but should almost always *not* contain burst or iburst when referring to someone else's servers". -- RPM _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
