David Woolley wrote: > David J Taylor wrote: > >> >> Would it be any better for the routine to lie, and just give to the >> nearest MHz, rounded down? > > That would result in an excessive error for those not using time > synchronisation software,
I might say /tough/! > and would produce extreme instability if the > frequency was very close to the exact MHz. Yes, that's why I suggested rounding, but there will undoubtedly be /some/ frequency for which it didn't work well. Suggestion withdrawn. Why do people mess with Linux like this? Are current versions of FreeBSD much better for timekeeping than Linux? David _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
