Bill, There is an apparent shortcoming in the existing PPS model/implementaion that I am still trying to wrap my head around.
https://support.ntp.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=557 has some information on this and I am looking for the other thread on that topic. As I understand it, and I almost certainly have the following wrong in at least some ways, there are folks out there who want to support multiple PPS inputs to NTP, and they also want to use a model where ntp's PPS driver maintains "health state" information about each PPS source. Dave maintains that the existing infrastructure can already mostly handle this, and while some work will be needed, the first set of folks are reinventing too much of the wheel. What I have been (slowly) working on is figuring out where the two above-mentioned groups are miscommunicating, and identifying exactly what needs to be done to come up with a solution. -- Harlan Stenn <st...@ntp.org> http://ntpforum.isc.org - be a member! _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
