In article <hapvl7$r9...@news.eternal-september.org>, da...@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid says... > > Michael Deutschmann wrote: > > > > > Would the experts here then want the government to mandate spread > > spectrum be ON, and if so, what sort of modulation to use? > > The general view in the amateur radio community is that spread spectrum > computer clocks are a bad thing, because they spread the misery. EMC > standards are compromises and significantly exceed natural background > noise levels, so it is better to knock out a few spot frequencies than > to possibly wipe out a whole amateur band. > > If you really wanted to solve the EMC problem, you would legislate for > screening that reduced the noise at about 1 metre to well under the > quiet time natural noise level, would require cases to be tested with > noisy motherboard, and would have severe penalties for sale and use of > case customising kits.
And then there is PLT... The Spawn of the Devil EMC wise for HF comm's (including WWV etc.) Check out www.ukqrm.org Bit of a cheesy site, but all the gore is there. Also, the messages on the Yahoo group of the same name, 'UKQRM' that is. Regards. Dave B. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
