On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 15:11 UTC, Dave Hart <daveh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 01:18 UTC, David J Taylor wrote:
Sorry, editing flub, the original message was at 13:18 UTC. > At a minimum to accomplish your stated goal your code should ensure > leap != 11 (that's normally displayed by ntpq in octal, so in Sorry, ntpq uses binary display for leap (and octal for reach). In both cases the on-wire form is decimal. Cheers, Dave Hart _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
