unruh wrote:
Uh, no. There is no way of getting the signal into the computer with

No pure sw way, no.

nanosecond accuracy. 1usec is about it. The interrupt service routines,
if you use a specialised driver for some interrupt driven card, will
take about 1usec to service the interrupt. Thus while the card may
deliver a pulse whose leading edge is within say 50ns of the correct
time that is irrelevant if the computer itself cannot respond fast
enough.

But I agree, with a GPS you can get usec accuracy in the time delivered
for less than $100.

Add some extra hw, in the form of a very good crystal (surplus Rb) and a hw counter which starts to run on the PPS signal, so that the sw can query it to determine how much interrupt latency we got this time, and you get a FreeBSD box down in the dual-digit nanoseconds.

Google phk!

Terje

--
- <Terje.Mathisen at tmsw.no>
"almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching"

_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
        • R... Chris Albertson
        • R... unruh
        • R... David J Taylor
          • ... Ken Link
            • ... Chris Albertson
              • ... unruh
              • ... Chris Albertson
              • ... Richard B. Gilbert
              • ... Chris Albertson
              • ... David J Taylor
              • ... Terje Mathisen
              • ... Chris Albertson
              • ... unruh
              • ... Chris Albertson
              • ... unruh
              • ... E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
              • ... E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
              • ... unruh
              • ... David J Taylor
            • ... E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
  • Re: [ntp:quest... Martin Burnicki

Reply via email to