On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:50, Miroslav Lichvar <mlich...@redhat.com> wrote:
> They are milliseconds. If ntpd on Windows can really keep the clock
> stable to to ~10 microseconds, the recent suggestion posted here to
> never use Windows for serious timekeeping might need to be revisited.

It can, with the stars aligned properly.  It's far from assured.  The
best results come from WS2003/WinXP and earlier versions of Windows,
where the Windows port of ntpd is nearly always able to interpolate a
high-precision clock from the combination of the stepping system clock
(10-15ms tick) and the so-called performance counter.  The challenge
is adaptively aligning the two counters, and the scheme currently used
breaks down with Vista and later due to being unable to schedule
sampling of the correlation at a multiple of the clock rate: typically
the clock ticks every 0.5 or 1 msec yet scheduling is limited to 1
msec precision.  With a little luck, ntpd automatically uses the
native windows clock directly (typically showing precision=-10), but
setting NTPD_USE_SYSTEM_CLOCK to any value in the system environment
variables might be useful to force the correct choice with ntpd 4.2.7.

Once you have a system where ntpd interpolation works well, the next
challenge is PPSAPI.  The windows port can use PPSAPI provider DLLs
and includes sample skeleton source code.  So far the only such DLL is
paired with a lightly tweaked Windows serial.sys known as
serialpps.sys.  Search for serialpps-ppsapi-provider to find it and
decide if you're willing to install unsigned driver code that claims
to timestamp DCD.

The results are worse than FreeBSD or Linux  I suspect the difference
is mostly due to the interpolation code having to guess at when, on
the counter timescale, the system clock ticked up to the present
value.  Some ugly busy-looping logic might help refine that and also
overcome the incompatibility with newer Windows versions' clocks.

Cheers,
Dave Hart
_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
  • Re: [ntp:quest... E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
    • Re: [ntp:... Mischanko, Edward T
      • Re: [... unruh
        • R... Rick Jones
          • ... unruh
            • ... Rick Jones
          • ... Mark C. Stephens
            • ... unruh
            • ... Mark C. Stephens
            • ... Miroslav Lichvar
            • ... Dave Hart
            • ... Miroslav Lichvar
            • ... Dave Hart
            • ... David J Taylor
            • ... Mark C. Stephens
            • ... David J Taylor
            • ... Miroslav Lichvar
            • ... Mark C. Stephens
            • ... Miguel Gonçalves
            • ... Mark C. Stephens
            • ... Miguel Gonçalves

Reply via email to