On 2011-12-09, Steve Kostecke <koste...@ntp.org> wrote: > On 2011-12-08, Bruce Lilly <bruce.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 20:14:28 +0000, Harlan Stenn wrote: >> >>> Bruce wrote: >>> >>>> 2) ntpd converges to a stable point that much faster (i.e. it has >>>> less of an initial offset to remove) >>> >>> At the moment, the worst case for this is an offset that is just >>> under 128ms, which will take under 5 minutes to apply at the >>> standard slew rate of 500ppm. (64ms will take about 2.5 minutes' >>> time to apply, etc.) > > functional equivalentfunctional equivalent
Ooops ... missed a botched edit. What I had intended to write was: This seems out of place in a discussion about replacing ntpdate. -- Steve Kostecke <koste...@ntp.org> NTP Public Services Project - http://support.ntp.org/ _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
