"Harlan Stenn" <st...@ntp.org> wrote in message
news:e1sa6us-000kpj...@stenn.ntp.org...
David wrote:
2164 needs discussion, unless altering the number of significant digits
in
the ntpq output wouldn't break anything. Do we need to have this
discussion? I have looked through ntpq.c, but I can't see where the
number of decimal digits in the output for offset is set.
I'd be inclined to do what we do for sntp, which is drive the number of
emitted digits based on the precision of the time.
H
Yes, I agree that makes sense. I would wish to see at minimum the decimal
point and tenths of milliseconds. On the system I want to monitor, the
precision is reported as -19, but the offsets need at least four decimal
places of milliseconds to be plotted with reasonable accuracy (i.e. tenths
of microseconds are needed).
Cheers,
David
_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
