Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> wrote:
> Unless you replace the motherboard clock source, anything below ~us
> precision is wasted.
Good to know. So basically the 1 or 2µs jitter I get after everything
has had time to settle down is the maximum archievable unless you
use rather exotic hardware.
> I have seen reports that the original Motorola Oncore UT+ had something
> like 30 ns RMS jitter (after applying the sw saw-tooth correction),
> while the $35 Sure board has been tested by one of the time-nuts people
> at ~25 ns?
That is great, so basically jitter is a non-issue compared to standard
computer hardware, and I am pleasantly surprised that the Sure board
is that good.
Has anybody checked the PPS output for constant shift against
UTC? Is it possible that the pulses are off with a constant offset,
even if they have very little jitter? Or is this unlikely from what
happens inside the receiver?
/ralph -- I am waiting for the first tutorial how to build a
rubidium-disciplined Raspberry Pi ;)
_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
