On 2013-11-03, Antonio Marcheselli <pu...@me.la> wrote: > On 03/11/2013 05:55, David Taylor wrote: >> On 02/11/2013 20:41, unruh wrote: >>> On 2013-11-02, antonio.marchese...@gmail.com >>> <antonio.marchese...@gmail.com> wrote: >> [] >>>> How can I verify if the stepping has been disabled or not? >>>> ntp.drift at the moment is -500.000 >>> >>> Which is way out of spec and cannot be corrected by ntpd. >> >> Yes, it can be corrected. There are ways of offsetting NTP to allow for >> clocks which are more than 500 ppm off nominal. Likely it's >> OS-dependant, but for Windows I documented the method here: >> >> http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/setup.html#broken-clock
There is information about fixing this issue in the NTP Community Supported Documentation at https://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Support/KnownHardwareIssues#Section_9.1.6. -- Steve Kostecke <koste...@ntp.org> NTP Public Services Project - http://support.ntp.org/ _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
