William Unruh writes: > On 2014-04-25, Paul <tik-...@bodosom.net> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:36 PM, William Unruh <un...@invalid.ca> wrote: > > > >> Why shoul dit ship with no refclocks? ... DO you have the same opinion for > >> serial > >> port or parallel ports, or network drivers? > > > > > > (Ignoring your mischaracterization of what I said and the strawman > > arguments) because a negligible number of time consumers have a refclock. > > Back in the day I recall a distro that had ntp-client and ntp-server > > packages -- so I'm sure I'm not the first person to propose it. > > More recent ntpd combine server and client in one program. > Not sure when that was.
It's been the case for at least 20 years' time. This is something that may be different in the upcoming rewrite. H _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
