I wrote: > Would it be useful to offer an "official" minimal implementation > intended for embedded systems so that these people won't feel the need > to code their own? Maybe add minimal NTP support to Busybox?
Brian Inglis writes: > AIUI an updated v4 sntp client will be released to replace ntpdate. > How about specifying the sntp core as an RFC for an embedded NTP > client? That would be even better. Designers could then claim they "have to" use it to be standards compliant. -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI USA _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
