On 09/12/2014 17:48, William Unruh wrote:
On 2014-12-09, David Taylor <david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> wrote:
On 09/12/2014 16:49, Paul wrote:
[]
Unless someone needs to share position and velocity data
I don't understand why gpsd is used to proxy NMEA data. The NMEA (or ATOM)
driver is sufficient.
Paul, does the NMEA (or ATOM) driver solve the problem of having perhaps
a couple of hundred milliseconds peak-to-peak jitter in the GPS serial
data, thereby preventing NTP using the PPS source?
??? It does use the pps source. nmea data will always have huge (on ntp
scale) jitter. And what evidence is there of preventing using the PPS
source?
I tried with the type 46 driver, and the PPS was rejected because the
NMEA part was rejected.
--
Cheers,
David
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
