On 19/01/15 14:47, Martin Burnicki wrote: > Actually I've tested a 4.2.8 client on Linux which only receives the > leap second warning from an upstream NTP server. > > There are other configuration options like presence of a leapsecond > file, NTP server mode receiving the announcement from a refclock, etc.
I see What I'll test starting (all probably) from February will be how the leap second is handled by recent versions of the Linux kernel and how it is handled by ntpd when kernel discipline is disabled. And then a number of other cases that grows each day :-) Yes, I'll share the results :-) Ciao -- bronto _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
