On Feb 24, 2015, at 11:40 AM, Paul <tik-...@bodosom.net> wrote: >> However, if you time things with a rhythm you can get to ~50 ms or better > > While these performance anecdotes are interesting they (starting with > unruh@invalid) are all anecdotes. I didn't mention research and real > numbers by accident.
Data is available. Feel free to review the papers referenced from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keystroke-level_model http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GOMS Regards, -- -Chuck PS: I took a Human-Computer Interaction class with Bonnie John many years ago; we used to film people performing tasks on computers and such with a 4x camera (96 FPS) with a millisecond digital timestamp in each frame and compared that with KLM and GOMS / CPM-GOMS / NGOMSL models. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
