We've implemented part of this spec in MsQuic and did see performance improvements as a result (in interop perf testing). I support adoption.
Thanks, - Nick Sent from Outlook<http://aka.ms/weboutlook> ________________________________ From: QUIC <[email protected]> on behalf of Dmitri Tikhonov <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2021 1:24 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Call For Adoption QUIC: delayed-ack I support adoption. - Dmitri. On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 12:38:50PM -0700, Matt Joras wrote: > Hello all, > > Now that we have been rechartered we can move forward with adopting > new items. It is the opinion of the chairs that the delayed-ack > draft[1] has sufficient interest from and relevance to the WG to be > formally adopted. This email is the call to do so. There are already > several interoperating implementations of the current draft. Please > reply to this email with any comments, the call will run through April > 6th. > > Thanks, > QUIC Chairs > > [1] > https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-iyengar-quic-delayed-ack%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cnibanks%40microsoft.com%7C8440bb1f431e47a610ec08d8f3b9eb34%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637527327568400460%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=jUZuAxa706o2sNrPh4XKewACsHE6hWmKD5BXjty3hJA%3D&reserved=0 >
