On Wed, Mar 31, 2021, at 06:38, Matt Joras wrote: > It is the opinion of the chairs that the delayed-ack > draft[1] has sufficient interest from and relevance to the WG to be > formally adopted.
I share that opinion. Adopt it.
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021, at 06:38, Matt Joras wrote: > It is the opinion of the chairs that the delayed-ack > draft[1] has sufficient interest from and relevance to the WG to be > formally adopted.
I share that opinion. Adopt it.