One gets to choose which to overflow—streamID or streamOffset, or both! Datagram-like things, where we choose the streamID option will use more bits-sum-total across the session to represent the whole address-space … but likely not enough to matter in net. -=R
From: QUIC <[email protected]> on behalf of Lucas Pardue <[email protected]> Date: Friday, July 23, 2021 at 1:04 PM To: "Das, Dibakar" <[email protected]> Cc: Sergio Garcia Murillo <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Alan Frindell <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Kirill Pugin <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Wish] Video ingest over QUIC On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 8:46 PM Das, Dibakar <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Thanks. So, you are making use of Stream ID being pretty long and there is no chance of overflow. I'm pretty sure someone in the QUIC WG did a back of a napkin calculation about how long it would take to overflow QUIC Stream IDs. I can't remember the figure but it was big, perhaps we should capture that number somewhere more formally :-D
