Events without label "editorial"

Issues
------
* quicwg/datagram (+6/-7/💬6)
 6 issues created:
 - Lack of application-defined format (by MikeBishop)
https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/35 - Update acknowledgements section to include WG contibutors (by tfpauly) https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/33 - Awkward phrasing of pacing requirement (by martinthomson) https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/32 - Reiterate need for 0-RTT profile (by martinthomson) https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/29 - Overstating value of acknowledgments (by martinthomson) https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/26 - Can be acknowledged? (by martinthomson) https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/24
 3 issues received 6 new comments:
 - #35 Lack of application-defined format (4 by DavidSchinazi, LPardue, 
MikeBishop, tfpauly)
https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/35 - #32 Awkward phrasing of pacing requirement (1 by tfpauly) https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/32 - #1 remind implementors of the "fun" parts of no flow control (1 by tfpauly) https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/1
 7 issues closed:
- Consider retransmission bit leakage https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/2 - Update acknowledgements section to include WG contibutors https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/33 - Question about scope: why only unreliable datagrams? Why not reliable datagrams too? https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/12 - remind implementors of the "fun" parts of no flow control https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/1 - Reiterate need for 0-RTT profile https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/29 - Overstating value of acknowledgments https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/26 - Can be acknowledged? https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/24
* quicwg/load-balancers (+3/-0/💬0)
 3 issues created:
 - Using AEAD IV to build nonce  (by nqv)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/127 - Same token body structure for Non-Shared-State and Shared-State (by nqv) https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/126 - Retry Source Connection ID included in token (by nqv) https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/125
* quicwg/qlog (+3/-0/💬3)
 3 issues created:
 - packet_number should not be required for vneg/retry packets (by rmarx)
https://github.com/quicwg/qlog/issues/171 - Discuss how to approach extensions short term (by rmarx) https://github.com/quicwg/qlog/issues/170 - Bad code block formatting for some events (by rmarx) https://github.com/quicwg/qlog/issues/169
 2 issues received 3 new comments:
 - #170 Discuss how to approach extensions short term (1 by LPardue)
https://github.com/quicwg/qlog/issues/170 - #153 Revisit category/type/name setup (2 by LPardue, jlaine) https://github.com/quicwg/qlog/issues/153


Pull requests
-------------
* quicwg/base-drafts (+0/-1/💬0)
 1 pull requests merged:
 - Remove duplicated "becomes unblocked when the Insert Count"
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4926
* quicwg/ops-drafts (+1/-0/💬1)
 1 pull requests submitted:
 - Talk about source ports (by mnot)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/392
 1 pull requests received 1 new comments:
 - #392 Talk about source ports (1 by mnot)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/392
* quicwg/datagram (+11/-9/💬3)
 11 pull requests submitted:
 - Acknowledge Victor (by DavidSchinazi)
https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/40 - Update acknowledgements (by tfpauly) https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/39 - Note retransmission logic different in security considerations (by tfpauly) https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/38 - Clarify scope to unreliable data only (by tfpauly) https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/37 - Rework pacing phrasing (by tfpauly) https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/36 - Editorial changes to the introduction (by tfpauly) https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/34 - Two items, and no comma (by martinthomson) https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/31 - 0-RTT needs a profile (by martinthomson) https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/30 - Tweak motivation (by martinthomson) https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/28 - Cannot rely on transport ACK (by martinthomson) https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/27 - Probes are sent (by martinthomson) https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/25
 2 pull requests received 3 new comments:
 - #38 Note retransmission logic difference in security considerations (1 by 
chris-wood)
https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/38 - #30 0-RTT needs a profile (2 by martinthomson, tfpauly) https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/30
 9 pull requests merged:
 - Note retransmission logic difference in security considerations
https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/38 - Update acknowledgements https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/39 - Clarify scope to unreliable data only https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/37 - Editorial changes to the introduction https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/34 - 0-RTT needs a profile https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/30 - Two items, and no comma https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/31 - Tweak motivation https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/28 - Cannot rely on transport ACK https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/27 - Probes are sent https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/25
* quicwg/version-negotiation (+3/-0/💬0)
 3 pull requests submitted:
 - Edits to Retry text (by martinthomson)
https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/pull/52 - Don't choose the oldest (by martinthomson) https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/pull/51 - Tweak the intro (by martinthomson) https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/pull/50

Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/datagram
* https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers
* https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation
* https://github.com/quicwg/quic-bit-grease
* https://github.com/quicwg/qlog

Reply via email to