Events without label "editorial"
Issues
------
* quicwg/base-drafts (+3/-0/💬15)
3 issues created:
- Handling of a lost push signal (by kazuho)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4930
- Disagreement in handling of unknown unidirectional stream types (by MikeBishop)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4929
- Ambiguity in section 5.2.2 of RFC 9000 (by su225)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4928
1 issues received 15 new comments:
- #4930 Handling of a lost push signal (15 by LPardue, MikeBishop,
RyanTheOptimist, afrind, ianswett, kazuho, tatsuhiro-t)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4930 [-http]
* quicwg/ops-drafts (+1/-1/💬2)
1 issues created:
- Ports and ALPN (by huitema)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/393
1 issues received 2 new comments:
- #393 Ports and ALPN (2 by huitema, mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/393
1 issues closed:
- Ports and ALPN https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/393
* quicwg/datagram (+3/-0/💬29)
3 issues created:
- Please define the frame using RFC 9000 style (by LPardue)
https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/43
- Allow a Sender to Datagram ACKs (by nibanks)
https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/42
- Is it obvious that Datagram frame can be aggregated in the same QUIC packet (by gloinul)
https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/41
4 issues received 29 new comments:
- #43 Please define the frame using RFC 9000 style (1 by DavidSchinazi)
https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/43
- #42 Allow a Sender to Control Datagram ACKs (24 by DavidSchinazi, LPardue, MikeBishop, mjoras, nibanks, wegylexy)
https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/42
- #41 Is it obvious that Datagram frame can be aggregated in the same QUIC packet (3 by DavidSchinazi, gloinul, tfpauly)
https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/41
- #35 Lack of application-defined format (1 by tfpauly)
https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/35
* quicwg/load-balancers (+0/-3/💬12)
3 issues received 12 new comments:
- #127 Using AEAD IV to build nonce (4 by martinduke, nqv)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/127
- #126 Same token body structure for Non-Shared-State and Shared-State (1 by martinduke)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/126
- #125 Retry Source Connection ID included in token (7 by huitema, martinduke, nqv)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/125
3 issues closed:
- Using AEAD IV to build nonce https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/127
- Same token body structure for Non-Shared-State and Shared-State https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/126
- Retry Source Connection ID included in token https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/125
* quicwg/version-negotiation (+0/-3/💬9)
6 issues received 9 new comments:
- #43 Should the client communicate version preference ordering? (1 by mjoras)
https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/issues/43
- #38 What does reprocess the first flight mean? (3 by DavidSchinazi, huitema)
https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/issues/38
- #37 Test case, authenticated handshake (1 by DavidSchinazi)
https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/issues/37
- #36 Domain separation requirements (1 by DavidSchinazi)
https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/issues/36
- #34 Need a rationale for changing the outer Version Number (1 by DavidSchinazi)
https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/issues/34
- #12 Define v1 and draft-29 Compatibility (2 by DavidSchinazi, nibanks)
https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/issues/12
3 issues closed:
- Define v1 and draft-29 Compatibility https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/issues/12
- Domain separation requirements https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/issues/36
- Need a rationale for changing the outer Version Number https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/issues/34
Pull requests
-------------
* quicwg/base-drafts (+1/-0/💬1)
1 pull requests submitted:
- Recommend careful behavior around push streams (by MikeBishop)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4931
1 pull requests received 1 new comments:
- #4931 Recommend careful behavior around push streams (1 by LPardue)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4931
* quicwg/ops-drafts (+0/-0/💬6)
1 pull requests received 6 new comments:
- #392 Talk about source ports (6 by enygren, martinthomson, mnot)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/392
* quicwg/datagram (+2/-1/💬0)
2 pull requests submitted:
- Datagram No Ack Frame Proposal (by nibanks)
https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/45
- Datagram No Ack TP Proposal (by nibanks)
https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/44
1 pull requests merged:
- Acknowledge Victor
https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/40
* quicwg/version-negotiation (+0/-4/💬0)
4 pull requests merged:
- Edits to Retry text
https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/pull/52
- Don't choose the oldest
https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/pull/51
- Tweak the intro
https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/pull/50
- Client validation
https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/pull/49
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/datagram
* https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers
* https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation
* https://github.com/quicwg/quic-bit-grease
* https://github.com/quicwg/qlog
