I support this resolution. - jana
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 2:12 PM Roberto Peon <[email protected]> wrote: > The decision works for me. Supported. > -=R > > > > *From: *QUIC <[email protected]> on behalf of Lucas Pardue < > [email protected]> > *Date: *Thursday, July 29, 2021 at 2:05 PM > *To: *QUIC WG <[email protected]> > *Cc: *QUIC WG Chairs <[email protected]> > *Subject: *Consensus call for Version Negotiation issue #43 > > > > Hello QUIC WG, > > > > During the IETF 111 meeting discussion of > draft-ietf-quic-version-negotiation we touched on issue #43 "Should the > client communicate version preference ordering?" [1]. > > > > The feeling in the room tended towards loose agreement on keeping the > preference ordering text in the document. Therefore, keeping the text is > the proposed resolution. > > This email seeks to establish consensus for the proposed resolution. If > you have comments for or against, please respond on the issue. The call > will run until EoD August 6 2021. > > Best Regards > > Matt & Lucas > > QUIC WG Chairs > > > [1] - https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/issues/43 >
