It's unnecessary and wasteful, but I can live with the outcome.
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021, at 07:04, Lucas Pardue wrote:
> Hello QUIC WG,
>
> During the IETF 111 meeting discussion of
> draft-ietf-quic-version-negotiation we touched on issue #43 "Should the
> client communicate version preference ordering?" [1].
>
> The feeling in the room tended towards loose agreement on keeping the
> preference ordering text in the document. Therefore, keeping the text
> is the proposed resolution.
>
> This email seeks to establish consensus for the proposed resolution. If
> you have comments for or against, please respond on the issue. The call
> will run until EoD August 6 2021.
>
> Best Regards
> Matt & Lucas
> QUIC WG Chairs
>
> [1] - https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/issues/43
