Hi, On 2022-1-21, at 12:53, Mirja Kuehlewind <[email protected]> wrote: > While this is more a clarification than an errata, having it verified would > show it in the errata-inline view and as such might actually help future > implementors to get this right. So I’m also not sure anymore; both could be > fine.
if readers would benefit from seeing this now (vs. whenever we rev the doc), that would argue for verifying it now. Thanks, Lars
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
