> On 25 Jan 2022, at 08:42, Lars Eggert <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 2022-1-21, at 12:53, Mirja Kuehlewind > <[email protected]> wrote: >> While this is more a clarification than an errata, having it verified would >> show it in the errata-inline view and as such might actually help future >> implementors to get this right. So I’m also not sure anymore; both could be >> fine. > > if readers would benefit from seeing this now (vs. whenever we rev the doc), > that would argue for verifying it now.
This was my thinking as well. I think we should verify it. //Zahed
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
