On Tue, Sep 17, 2024, at 09:49, Lars Eggert wrote: > maybe I'm missing something, but isn't the ACK delay encoded in an ACK > frame (only) the delay of the largest ACK'ed packet number? How would > you disambiguate between ack-eliciting and non-ack-eliciting packet > numbers when you parse an ACK?
The sender tracks whether the packet they sent was ack-eliciting.
