I support adoption. To MT's point, I think the motivation for this was explained reasonably well in a blog post by Marten and Christian but is missing from the draft itself - it would be helpful to copy some of that into the draft.
David On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 12:59 PM Martin Thomson <[email protected]> wrote: > Sure. I struggle a little with the "why" part though. What purpose is > furthered by collecting this information? > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025, at 13:59, Lucas Pardue wrote: > > Hello QUIC WG, > > > > During IETF 121 we discussed draft-seemann-quic-address-discovery [1] > > and the sense in the room was that this is something the WG should work > > on. > > > > This is a formal adoption call that will run for 2 weeks, ending on > > February 25 2025 at 23:59 anywhere on earth[2]. Please respond to this > > email thread with any comments indicating support or objection. In > > either case, elucidation of your opinion would be appreciated. > > > > Kind regards > > Lucas & Matt > > QUIC WG Chairs > > > > [1] - > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-seemann-quic-address-discovery/ > > [2] - https://time.is/Anywhere_on_Earth > >
