I support this 100 percent.
Kevin
On 2/11/2025 2:39 PM, David Schinazi wrote:
I support adoption.
To MT's point, I think the motivation for this was explained
reasonably well in a blog post by Marten and Christian but is missing
from the draft itself - it would be helpful to copy some of that into
the draft.
David
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 12:59 PM Martin Thomson <[email protected]> wrote:
Sure. I struggle a little with the "why" part though. What
purpose is furthered by collecting this information?
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025, at 13:59, Lucas Pardue wrote:
> Hello QUIC WG,
>
> During IETF 121 we discussed
draft-seemann-quic-address-discovery [1]
> and the sense in the room was that this is something the WG
should work
> on.
>
> This is a formal adoption call that will run for 2 weeks, ending on
> February 25 2025 at 23:59 anywhere on earth[2]. Please respond
to this
> email thread with any comments indicating support or objection. In
> either case, elucidation of your opinion would be appreciated.
>
> Kind regards
> Lucas & Matt
> QUIC WG Chairs
>
> [1] -
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-seemann-quic-address-discovery/
> [2] - https://time.is/Anywhere_on_Earth
