Hi chairs, hi all, we had some discussion on list and in the meeting suggesting to rather use a new frame than using an extended ACK. I generally support this work but I would actually rather want to adopt a document that reflects this change. Or what’s the plan here?
Mirja From: Lucas Pardue <[email protected]> Date: Monday, 14. April 2025 at 21:01 To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Cc: QUIC WG Chairs <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Adoption call: QUIC Extended Acknowledgement for Reporting Packet Receive Timestamps Reminder: the call for adoption closes at the end of this week On Thu, Apr 3, 2025, at 20:58, Lucas Pardue wrote: Hi folks, At IETF 122 we discussed QUIC Extended Acknowledgement for Reporting Packet Receive Timestamps [1]. The sense of the room was that there was support for the QUIC WG adopting work on ACKs with timestamps. The email launches a formal adoption call for draft-smith-quic-receive-ts-01 as the basis of this work. The call will run until end of day 2025-04-18 anywhere on earth [2] Please post comments in favor or against as replies to this thread. Cheers Lucas & Matt QUIC WG Chairs [1] - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-smith-quic-receive-ts/ [2] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anywhere_on_Earth
