2025年4月17日(木) 1:00 Ian Swett <[email protected]>:

> Coming from an author's perspective, I'm happy to remove the extended ACK
> portion and ship a new draft version before adoption.
>
> I wrote a PR that does that and always includes the timestamp section at
> the end of ACK frames, for example:
> https://github.com/wcsmith/draft-quic-receive-ts/pull/8
>

I support adoption, and I also think that this PR is in the right direction.

Though I kind of wonder if we could agree on how to annotate ACK packets.
At the moment, Multipath QUIC adds a path identifier and uses a different
frame type. This pull request adds a new field for acks, reusing the
original frame type.

I think people have argued that we do not need to develop an encoding
scheme that allows extensions add new fields to the ACK frame. I fully
agree with that.

But at the same time, I wonder if extensions could agree on one way of
annotating ACKs rather than trying to define their own ways.


>
> Thanks, Ian
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 5:41 AM Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind=
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi chairs, hi all,
>>
>>
>>
>> we had some discussion on list and in the meeting suggesting to rather
>> use a new frame than using an extended ACK. I generally support this work
>> but I would actually rather want to adopt a document that reflects this
>> change. Or what’s the plan here?
>>
>>
>>
>> Mirja
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Lucas Pardue <[email protected]>
>> *Date: *Monday, 14. April 2025 at 21:01
>> *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>> *Cc: *QUIC WG Chairs <[email protected]>
>> *Subject: *Re: Adoption call: QUIC Extended Acknowledgement for
>> Reporting Packet Receive Timestamps
>>
>>
>>
>> Reminder: the call for adoption closes at the end of this week
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2025, at 20:58, Lucas Pardue wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>>
>>
>> At IETF 122 we discussed QUIC Extended Acknowledgement for Reporting
>> Packet Receive Timestamps [1]. The sense of the room was that there was
>> support for the QUIC WG adopting work on ACKs with timestamps.
>>
>>
>>
>> The email launches a formal adoption call
>> for draft-smith-quic-receive-ts-01 as the basis of this work. The call will
>> run until end of day 2025-04-18 anywhere on earth [2]
>>
>>
>>
>> Please post comments in favor or against as replies to this thread.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Lucas & Matt
>>
>> QUIC WG Chairs
>>
>>
>>
>> [1] - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-smith-quic-receive-ts/
>>
>> [2] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anywhere_on_Earth
>>
>>
>>
>>

-- 
Kazuho Oku

Reply via email to