OK..so I interpret this to mean that if QP says 0 analysts..that does not necessarily mean that there are 0 analysts..but rather, just that Reuters shows 0 analysts? Good to know.
--- In [email protected], "gary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi > > We redistribute data from reuters, they apparantly do not have coverage of PCC: > > http://stocks.us.reuters.com/stocks/estimates.asp? symbol=PCC&WTmodLOC=L2-LeftNav-23-Estimates > > http://stocks.us.reuters.com/stocks/recommendations.asp? symbol=PCC&WTmodLOC=L2-LeftNav-24-Recommendations > > Reuters has a lot odf different products, some of which overlap, so it may be the case that one groups has published a report on PCC thaat you are seeing. The above links use the products that we have. > > Best regards, > > Gary > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: investor0329 > To: [email protected] > Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 1:29 AM > Subject: [quotes-plus] Gary/anyone: Ticker PCC .. why does QP say 0 analysts? > > > According QP report in Charts section (v2.3).... there are 0s in all > categories for analyst recommendations. However, when I go to my > Etrade account, in their reports section, their Jaywalk consensus > states the results of 7 analysts! In addition they have a report from > Reuters and from Thompson. > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
