Investor0329: I suspect that you are confusing research reports with analysts maintaining ratings which are reported in the analysis ratings.
It is doubtful that 7 analysts are following a 153 million dollar cap stock on the AMEX. It just does not happen. I too am concerned about the quality of some of the information that is contained in the QP database, but this one is not one of them. Dale --- In [email protected], "investor0329" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You can often get this info at your broker's website...for example, > ETrade is excellent in this regard. > > Problem is.. I need this info computerized to do scans rather than > looking at reports 1 by 1. > > If QP only has Reuters data, then I would guess that it is very > incomplete because as I study the Etrade site, there are many many, > for example, S&P analyst reports for stocks where Reuters shows no > coverage, and vice versa. I always thought the analysts were totally > counted..but I guess I was wrong. > > So if QP shows only 1 analyst covering a stock, in reality, there > may be 3, 4, or more...right? > > > > --- In [email protected], "Lionel Issen" <lissen@> > wrote: > > > > This raises the next question: where can we get this information? > > > > _____ > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:quotes- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of investor0329 > > Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 5:57 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [quotes-plus] Re: Gary/anyone: Ticker PCC .. why does QP > say 0 > > analysts? > > > > > > > > OK..so I interpret this to mean that if QP says 0 analysts..that > > does not necessarily mean that there are 0 analysts..but rather, > > just that Reuters shows 0 analysts? Good to know. > > > > --- In quotes-plus@ <mailto:quotes-plus%40yahoogroups.com> > yahoogroups.com, > > "gary" <gary@> wrote: > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > We redistribute data from reuters, they apparantly do not have > > coverage of PCC: > > > > > > http://stocks. > <http://stocks.us.reuters.com/stocks/estimates.asp?> > > us.reuters.com/stocks/estimates.asp? > > symbol=PCC&WTmodLOC=L2-LeftNav-23-Estimates > > > > > > http://stocks. > <http://stocks.us.reuters.com/stocks/recommendations.asp?> > > us.reuters.com/stocks/recommendations.asp? > > symbol=PCC&WTmodLOC=L2-LeftNav-24-Recommendations > > > > > > Reuters has a lot odf different products, some of which overlap, > > so it may be the case that one groups has published a report on > PCC > > thaat you are seeing. The above links use the products that we > have. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Gary > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: investor0329 > > > To: quotes-plus@ <mailto:quotes-plus%40yahoogroups.com> > yahoogroups.com > > > Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 1:29 AM > > > Subject: [quotes-plus] Gary/anyone: Ticker PCC .. why does QP > > say 0 analysts? > > > > > > > > > According QP report in Charts section (v2.3).... there are 0s in > > all > > > categories for analyst recommendations. However, when I go to my > > > Etrade account, in their reports section, their Jaywalk > > consensus > > > states the results of 7 analysts! In addition they have a report > > from > > > Reuters and from Thompson. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > >
