Hi John,

No, i'm saying that as far as i now, nobody sucefully built quetcom
with mingw...

There is no problems with VS build...

Thanks
Vadim

John A Hengstler wrote:
> I am sorry.  I am coming into this new.   
>
>  
>
> Are you suggesting that MinGW AND VS builds are not really tested for
> Windows  or the code is not tested?   
>
>  
>
> I am actually almost through the entire compilation on VS.      The windows
> build is problematic but adjusting some files as I go.  It seems several of
> the patch's I found in the archives were never actually patched in the
> repository.
>
>  
>
> I am interested in this application for Windows environments.
>
>  
>
> Thanks
>
>  
>
> John
>
>  
>
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Vadim Lebedev
> Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 5:13 AM
> To: Laurent Tarrisse
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Bulk] Qutecom 2.2 final
>
>  
>
> The mingw stuff is was operation some time ago, it is  REALLY untested os of
> now;
>
>
> Thanks
> Vadim
>
> Laurent Tarrisse wrote: 
>
> I think, it is a bad idea.
>  
> Laurent
>  
> John A Hengstler a écrit :
>   
>
> Thanks for your input on this.   I made the adjustment to the
> findboost.cmake file and I am now compiling.
>  
> Is the mingw build the better route to go?    I can do that instead.
>  
> John
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laurent Tarrisse [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 7:15 PM
> To: John A Hengstler; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Bulk] Qutecom 2.2 final
>  
> Hello John
>  
> We used to build qutecom with visual 2005 and boost 1.34.
>  
> With vc 9 and boost 1.38 you will get a lot of problems ...
>  
> Anyway, this is a patch for you .
>  
> Laurent
>  
> John A Hengstler a écrit :
>   
>     
>
> I have been very interested In this project, but have yet to even get out
>     
>       
>
> of
>   
>     
>
> the gate to compile.   
>  
> I am trying to compile for Windows.  
> I have cmake 2.6.4 installed, qt and qtdir path set properly.
> I have boost 1_38 installed using installer.
>  
> When I try to use cmake I get Boost cannot be found.
>  
> I then set my env variable BOOST_ROOt=c:/Program 
> Files/boost/boost_1_38
>  
> Which did get me further to find the includes, but NOT the libs
>  
> I have set BOOST_LIBRARYDIR properly but is still failing.   I am even
> trying to run cmake -DBoost_Debug=TRUE .. -G "Visual Studio 9 2008" 
>  
> But I get no debug output
>  
> The Exact error I get from cmake is:
>  
> --found boost includes in c:/Program Files/boost/boost_1_38 --found 
> boost libs in TMP-NOTFOUND"
>  
> Is this a cmake problem or just and env problem.  I will be glad to 
> provide additional information as needed. :)
>  
> Does anybody have any pointers for me to solve this.    I very much would
> like to add to this project.
>  
> Thanks very much in advance.
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michal 
> Andrzej Wozniak
> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:52 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Qutecom-dev
> Subject: Re: [Bulk] Qutecom 2.2 final
>  
> Dnia środa 13 maj 2009, Vadim Lebedev napisał(a):
>   
>     
>       
>
> Folks,
>  
> We're planning to release 2.2 final this Friday...
>  
> We'll provide Windows and Mac OS/X 10.5 Builds.
>     
>       
>         
>
> What about Linux?
>  
> I was trying to compile the 2.2 branch (on Kubuntu Hardy), but failed 
> on several ocasions.
> Any howtos/hints on that?
>  
> Cheers
> Mike
> _______________________________________________
> QuteCom-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev
>  
> _______________________________________________
> QuteCom-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev
>  
>  
>   
>     
>       
>
>  
>  
>   
>     
>
>  
> _______________________________________________
> QuteCom-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev
>  
>  
>   
>
>  
>
>
>   

_______________________________________________
QuteCom-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev

Reply via email to