John, Can you please resubmit these patches to the mailing list, so that we'll be able to review them and maybe integrate theme brfore tagging the 2.2 final today
Thanks Vadim John A Hengstler wrote: > Ok...Thank You. I just misunderstood your statement. > > I am building under VS 2008. > > There were 3 patchs in the archives that never made it to the repository for > win32. > > I had failures in building until I applied the patches. Was there a reason > they didn't get patched? I didn't see any posts anywhere regarding this. > > > John > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vadim Lebedev [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 6:19 AM > To: John A Hengstler; Qutecom-dev > Subject: Re: [Bulk] Qutecom 2.2 final > > Hi John, > > No, i'm saying that as far as i now, nobody sucefully built quetcom > with mingw... > > There is no problems with VS build... > > Thanks > Vadim > > John A Hengstler wrote: > >> I am sorry. I am coming into this new. >> >> >> >> Are you suggesting that MinGW AND VS builds are not really tested for >> Windows or the code is not tested? >> >> >> >> I am actually almost through the entire compilation on VS. The >> > windows > >> build is problematic but adjusting some files as I go. It seems several >> > of > >> the patch's I found in the archives were never actually patched in the >> repository. >> >> >> >> I am interested in this application for Windows environments. >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> John >> >> >> >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Vadim Lebedev >> Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 5:13 AM >> To: Laurent Tarrisse >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Bulk] Qutecom 2.2 final >> >> >> >> The mingw stuff is was operation some time ago, it is REALLY untested os >> > of > >> now; >> >> >> Thanks >> Vadim >> >> Laurent Tarrisse wrote: >> >> I think, it is a bad idea. >> >> Laurent >> >> John A Hengstler a écrit : >> >> >> Thanks for your input on this. I made the adjustment to the >> findboost.cmake file and I am now compiling. >> >> Is the mingw build the better route to go? I can do that instead. >> >> John >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Laurent Tarrisse [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 7:15 PM >> To: John A Hengstler; [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Bulk] Qutecom 2.2 final >> >> Hello John >> >> We used to build qutecom with visual 2005 and boost 1.34. >> >> With vc 9 and boost 1.38 you will get a lot of problems ... >> >> Anyway, this is a patch for you . >> >> Laurent >> >> John A Hengstler a écrit : >> >> >> >> I have been very interested In this project, but have yet to even get out >> >> >> >> of >> >> >> >> the gate to compile. >> >> I am trying to compile for Windows. >> I have cmake 2.6.4 installed, qt and qtdir path set properly. >> I have boost 1_38 installed using installer. >> >> When I try to use cmake I get Boost cannot be found. >> >> I then set my env variable BOOST_ROOt=c:/Program >> Files/boost/boost_1_38 >> >> Which did get me further to find the includes, but NOT the libs >> >> I have set BOOST_LIBRARYDIR properly but is still failing. I am even >> trying to run cmake -DBoost_Debug=TRUE .. -G "Visual Studio 9 2008" >> >> But I get no debug output >> >> The Exact error I get from cmake is: >> >> --found boost includes in c:/Program Files/boost/boost_1_38 --found >> boost libs in TMP-NOTFOUND" >> >> Is this a cmake problem or just and env problem. I will be glad to >> provide additional information as needed. :) >> >> Does anybody have any pointers for me to solve this. I very much would >> like to add to this project. >> >> Thanks very much in advance. >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michal >> Andrzej Wozniak >> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:52 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: Qutecom-dev >> Subject: Re: [Bulk] Qutecom 2.2 final >> >> Dnia środa 13 maj 2009, Vadim Lebedev napisał(a): >> >> >> >> >> Folks, >> >> We're planning to release 2.2 final this Friday... >> >> We'll provide Windows and Mac OS/X 10.5 Builds. >> >> >> >> >> What about Linux? >> >> I was trying to compile the 2.2 branch (on Kubuntu Hardy), but failed >> on several ocasions. >> Any howtos/hints on that? >> >> Cheers >> Mike >> _______________________________________________ >> QuteCom-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> QuteCom-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> QuteCom-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >
_______________________________________________ QuteCom-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev
