Hi,
If you go on the qws sight, you'll find in the downloads section, a link that says audio downloads. Currently the only thing there is a little demonstration of what QWS can do. You can call it a tutorial but it's not really one, the manual is far better at guiding you slowly through everything. that file just gives you an idea of how various things are done, and is equally is good. One thing to note, though, that file is getting pretty old now.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Aaron Linson" <[email protected]>
To: "QWS list" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2011 7:22 PM
Subject: QWS List Audio tutorials


Where can I find audio tutorials explaining how to use qws??

Once an Eagle
Always an Eagle

On Aug 7, 2011, at 4:43 PM, Leonard de Ruijter <[email protected]> wrote:

 Hey Raymond,

 I have to say that qws seemed quite complicated to me when i started
 working with it. Another thing, which is a big credit to Andre, as
 soon as i started listening to some of his tutorials, i found qws
 getting more and more interesting for me, and understood more of
 it. For example, i've played with note transform for several days
 after i listened andre's tutorial concerning this. I use qws for every
 sequencing work i have to do now, and it works great. Lots of
 functions qws has i miss in daws, for example the quick note editing
 and midi assignments. So may be it's an idea to point
 the daw-lovers to Andre's tutorials. One remark i also have to make
 is that some of my sighted friends found qws quite scary as well, but
 that's more about how they found it look like, and as it is mainly
 used by blind musicians, i don't care.
--
Regards,
Leonard de Ruijter
Playing in the dark



Sunday, August 7, 2011, 9:56:04 PM, you wrote:

Hi all,
Here's an interesting question. When I learned QWS,  I didn't
have anyone to help me out with it, just the setting up the keyboard
part. And I had to learn most of the tools and functions myself.
While I am a decent musician, I don't consider myself better than
everyone. But  QWS just came natural to me, a little more than I had
expected. There are  sighted people I know that know way more than I
do, who use other programs  which are not at all accessible. They
have a whole workstation in front of them,  and they can do way more
than impport midi data and play it back, they can tweak  pretty much
every synth and effect peramitor there is. Whether they actually
know the ins and outs of it I don't know, but it sure seems like
they  do.
Now the question. I know people who are impressed  with the work
I do, contrary to my opinion, lol. but, they wanted to know how I
did it, but they're sort of geared into something like I said above
and I'm not  sure exactly how to approach QWs. I initially said,
"The manual's really good,  you should understand it." I was under
the impression that QWS's features  were pretty familiar to any midi
sequencer that knows what they're doing, and it  would be
ridiculously simple. But then an hour later they'd uninstall because
it  was either too complicated for them or too slow. I then realized
that QWS  and a DAW are pretty different, QWS is like Notepad, where
it doesn't offer  amazing functions with one clikc. You have to use
the thirty or so tools that it  provides you, in the way you want
them, not go by some factory of presets  already made for you and
tweak it from there.
So am I even partially right? Is QWS really  complicated from
that standpoint, or could it be lack of patience? We've all  seen
what Andre can do with it, I myself found it hard to believe that he
used  QWS at first since I'm nowhere near that level.
Maybe some of you here have had similar experiences and can give more insight.




To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com

for archived list posts, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com

for archived list posts, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com

for archived list posts, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to