Why does everyone want to turn every program into a DAW? I've heard people refer to Reason as a DAW recently, which it isn't, and now the desire to turn QWS into a DAW?
If QWS starts adding a bunch of DAW features like audio and the like I'll stop using it. This application bloat philosophy drives me nuts. No one tries to talk Craftsman or Snap-on into making a tool that is a hammer, screwdriver, pliers, adjustable wrench, drill, sander, and tape measure. Every time you increase the functions of code you slow the code. If I want to use loops or some such in QWS I'd just get a VST sampler and use MIDI Yoke or another program to access it if I needed extra connections. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alexander Westphal Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 8:13 AM To: QWS list Subject: Re: QWS List QWS and Audio? Wow! Great! As I said, that would be a reason to pay for it! Don't get me wrong, QWS is awesome, but at this time I think it is the most stable Sequencer and maybe in the future a little, but fine DAW. Don't know! There are so many unfinished projects, like ReaAccess and that stuff, and QWS is so simple and already powerful, like it is now. I think it could only get better! I hope my Opinion is clear to understand. Sorry again for my miserable language. To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com for archived list posts, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com for archived list posts, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
