Since QWS doesn't do anything but MIDI, you can't use QWS for this at all. On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 10:37:47 +0200, you wrote:
>Somewhat on this topic, i would just like to ask a question. > >Can one import a keyboard's drum pattern that's part of the keyboards song >set. >When i want to create a song with QWS i don't want to rewrite the drums when >i already have the perfect drum pattern on my keyboard. > >I can do it with my RCA audio cable, but how do i mix the wave and midi >together? >Or do i just watch the metronom. > >I usually just use Audacity for my audio recording. > >Thanks, >Dewald. > >Dewald Louwrens van Deventer > >Cell: +2782-461-4865 > >Fax: +2786-612-5921 > >E-mail: <[email protected]> > >Skypename: <dewie007> > >Facebook: <Dewald Louwrens van Deventer> >--- >Music should strike fire from the heart of man, and bring tears from the >eyes of woman. >Ludwig Van Beethoven > >Music expresses that which cannot be said and on which it is impossible to >be silent. >Victor Hugo >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Steve Matzura" <[email protected]> >To: "QWS list" <[email protected]> >Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 5:22 AM >Subject: Re: QWS List QWS and Audio? > > >My sentiments, exactly, Raymond, and I've tried them all--Reason, >Sonar, Pro Tools, even Garage Band. I've decided Sound Forge is as big >a digital audio workstation as I'll ever need, want, or use. Neither >do I sing nor play an instrument that requires a microphone to capture >its performances. > > >On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:54:21 -0500, you wrote: > >>Hi, >>Well, I have my ideas. For someone like me who is only decent at music and >>midi stuff, and not what the common DAW terms are, using one is no easy >>task, especially when they tend to be big and sometimes slow as you said. >>Plus, for me, QWS and Gold Wave click perfectly. As soon as I opened both >>for the first time, I could do things with them, and I only had to use the >>manual when I needed it. but if I have a program like a DAW that isn't so >>easy to just start and record with, and I have to look through a hundred >>page PDF to figure out why, I simply get discouraged. >>DAWs are just big and scary things that I'm not well rehearsed at. Of >>course >>we can't expect QWS to cover that. If QWS were to evolve into any audio >>form, I'd think the most it would need to do is be able to load, and or >>record audio files, and be able to mix, edit and have effects, even if it's >>just VST effect support. Then you could chop audio up with some basic >>splicing features, and perform audio edits like you would in midi, by >>selecting the part you want to modify in beats and ticks. And then mix >>tracks and have all of the QWS midi functions for midi editing. That's the >>utmost I could ever expect a program like QWS to do. But will it ever >>happen? Probably not. There's no real strong need for it and it would >>probably need to be almost completely recoded, which takes up way too much >>energy especially for one person. I can use audio editors for my audio >>recording and mixing needs and QWS for the midi stuff. It's more primitive >>and it probably takes longer, but I've grown used to it. Then again I am >>only a hobbiest. >> >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: "Nicole Massey" <[email protected]> >>To: "QWS list" <[email protected]> >>Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 9:31 AM >>Subject: RE: QWS List QWS and Audio? >> >> >>> Why does everyone want to turn every program into a DAW? I've heard >>> people >>> refer to Reason as a DAW recently, which it isn't, and now the desire to >>> turn QWS into a DAW? >>> >>> If QWS starts adding a bunch of DAW features like audio and the like I'll >>> stop using it. This application bloat philosophy drives me nuts. No one >>> tries to talk Craftsman or Snap-on into making a tool that is a hammer, >>> screwdriver, pliers, adjustable wrench, drill, sander, and tape measure. >>> Every time you increase the functions of code you slow the code. If I >>> want >>> to use loops or some such in QWS I'd just get a VST sampler and use MIDI >>> Yoke or another program to access it if I needed extra connections. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >>> Alexander Westphal >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 8:13 AM >>> To: QWS list >>> Subject: Re: QWS List QWS and Audio? >>> >>> Wow! Great! As I said, that would be a reason to pay for it! Don't get >>> me wrong, QWS is awesome, but at this time I think it is the most stable >>> Sequencer and maybe in the future a little, but fine DAW. Don't know! >>> There are so many unfinished projects, like ReaAccess and that stuff, >>> and QWS is so simple and already powerful, like it is now. I think it >>> could only get better! I hope my Opinion is clear to understand. Sorry >>> again for my miserable language. >>> To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com >>> >>> for archived list posts, see >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] >>> >>> To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com >>> >>> for archived list posts, see >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] >> >>To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com >> >>for archived list posts, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] >To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com > >for archived list posts, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] > >To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com > >for archived list posts, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com for archived list posts, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
