That makes a good deal of sense, Raymond. Like I always say, eschew obfuscation (avoid confusion) (LOL).
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 20:19:00 -0500, you wrote: >Hi, >I believe this is there so that when you select a program and bank >combination that are not in the list, it can show up as a blank entry to let >the user know that they are using something not defined in the list. My >guess is, if this were not there, a screen reader might just read one of the >instruments in the list, and the user might think they are using that >instrument instead of the program and bank combination they have selected. >It's sort of like the -1 thing with track properties, it means that it is >left where it was. At least this is how I interpreted all that. > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Steve Matzura" <[email protected]> >To: "QWS list" <[email protected]> >Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 8:01 PM >Subject: QWS List Question about instrument definition lists in track >properties > > >Why is it that instruments always show up with an extra blank line in >the first position of a patch list for an instrument? Both my synths >show up like this, with one blank line at the top of each one. Very >odd. Did I put something into the instrument definition that shouldn't >be there, or in the wrong format? >To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com > >for archived list posts, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] > >To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com > >for archived list posts, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com for archived list posts, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
