On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Kevin R. Coombes <kevin.r.coom...@gmail.com> wrote: > You can also see the odd behavior without wrapping round in another > function: > >> round(100.1, digits=) > [1] 100
Hmm... is there a reason for why the parser accepts that construct? Some example: > parse(text="f(a=)") expression(f(a=)) > parse(text="f[a=]") expression(f[a=]) > parse(text="(a=)") Error in parse.default(text = "(a=)") : <text>:1:4: unexpected ')' 1: (a=) /Henrik > > On 11/18/2011 10:19 AM, Joris Meys wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Gavin Simpson<gavin.simp...@ucl.ac.uk> >> wrote: >>> >>> round is indicated to not evaluate its arguments. I don't follow the C >>> code well enough to know if it should be catching the missing argument >>> further on - it must be because it is falling back to the default, but >>> the above explains that the not evaluating arguments is intended. >>> >>> G >> >> So if I understand it right, the y argument is not evaluated in the >> fun2 function but deeper in the C code. that explains the lack of the >> error message, thanks! I keep on learning every day. >> Cheers >> >> Joris >> > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
