On Sep 16, 2013, at 01:46 PM, Brian Rowe wrote:

That reminds me: I once made a suggestion on how to automate some of the CRAN
deployment process, but it was shot down as not being useful to them. I do
recall a quote that was along the lines of "as long as you don't need help,
do whatever you want", so one thought is to just set up a build server that
does the building across the three versions of R, checks dependencies, rebuilds
when release, patch, or devel are updated, etc. This would ease the burden on
package maintainers and would just happen to make the CRAN folks' lives easier
by catching a lot of bad builds. A proof of concept on AWS connecting to github
or rforge could probably be finished on a six-pack. Speak up if anyone thinks
this would be useful.

Yes useful. But that includes a package build system (which is what breaks on
R-Forge). If you could do that on a six-pack then could you fix R-Forge on a
three-pack first please? The R-Forge build system is itself an open source
package on R-Forge. Anyone can look at it, understand it and change it to be
more stable. That build system is here :

https://r-forge.r-project.org/R/?group_id=34

(I only know this because Stefan told me once. So I suspect others don't know
either, or it hasn't sunk in that we're pushing on an open door.)

Matthew

______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to