Thanks for the great insight. I love that there's always something else to 
learn in R. 

•••••
Brian Lee Yung Rowe
Founder, Zato Novo
Professor, M.S. Data Analytics, CUNY

On Jun 16, 2014, at 3:34 AM, Martin Maechler <maech...@stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote:

>>>>>> Adrian Dușa <dusa.adr...@unibuc.ro>
>>>>>>    on Mon, 16 Jun 2014 08:33:59 +0300 writes:
> 
>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 6:37 AM, Gabriel Becker
>> <gmbec...@ucdavis.edu> wrote:
>>> [...]  You can. This is valid R source, so the parser
>>> will understand it
>>> 
>>> expr = parse(text= example("deMorgan", package="QCA",
>>> give.lines=TRUE))
>>> 
>>> You can then evaluate some or all of that expression
>>> using either R's own eval package or, e.g. Hadley
>>> Wickham's evaluate package (for your particular usecase
>>> evaluate will be easier I think).
> 
>> Oh, I see...! In that case I can use it, of course.  Did
>> install the evaluate package, although one would expect
>> some better documentation (no examples at all, especially
>> at the main evaluate function).
> 
> 
>>>> [...]
>>> index.search is an unexported function, which means that
>>> it is subject to change in how it behaves without notice
>>> or even externally available reasons. You can get it via
>>> :::, but again, it's really not the right tool here, and
>>> not safe to use in general in code you expect to keep
>>> working.
> 
>> Yes, I figured that much.  Of course it's not meant to be
>> used in any decently working code, but I learn heavily by
>> simply looking at these sort of (hidden) R functions.
> 
>> Thanks again, Adrian
> 
> Apropos "not the right tool".  I'm a bit astonished that nobody
> mentioned the fact R already provides "the tool" to
> automatically compare all example outputs with a previous
> version (of the packages example outputs):
> 
> *THE* manual (every package writer should know about,
> re-read/browse about once a year, and search in for such questions):
> 
> "Writing R Extensions", section Package subdirectories
> ----------------------------
> (e.g. on the CRAN master in Vienna,
> http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-exts.html#Package-subdirectories )
> says
> 
> |    If directory 'tests' has a subdirectory 'Examples' containing a file
> |    'PKG-Ex.Rout.save', this is compared to the output file for running the
> |    examples when the latter are checked. 
> 
> So: After an 'R CMD check <PKG>' you only need to take and
> keep the  <PKG>-Ex.Rout  file that is produced (in the
> PKG.Rcheck/ directory), and save it into <PKG>/tests/<PKG>-Ex.Rout.save
> and from then on, every time you run R CMD check <PKG>  the
> comparison will be made. 
> 
> Martin Maechler, ETH Zurich
> 
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to