You might find this article useful.... Kellie B. Keeling and Robert J. Pavur, A comparative study of the reliability of nine statistical software packages, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Volume 51, Issue 8, 1 May 2007, Pages 3811-3831. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V8V-4JHMGWJ-1/2/77a29a95c2071997f13fcca7267711d1)
Alberto Monteiro wrote: > > I need arguments pro-S-PLUS and against SAS for a meeting I will > have next week. S-Plus is (90 - 99)% compatible with R, so using > S-Plus will make things much easier for everyone. But I can't use > this argument. What other arguments could I use? > > Alberto Monteiro > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/I-need-arguments-pro-S-PLUS-and-against-SAS...-tp14621011p14713230.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.