"It gets curiouser and curiouser," said Alice.

-- Bert

On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:07 PM, array chip <arrayprof...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Paul, thanks for your thoughts. blunt, not at all....
>
> If I understand correctly, it doesn't help anything to speculate whether 
> there might be additional variables existing or not. Given current variables 
> in the model, it's perfectly fine to draw conclusions based on significant 
> coefficients regardless of R-squared is high or low.
>
> Gary King's article is interesting...
>
> John
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: Paul Johnson <pauljoh...@gmail.com>
>
> Cc: peter dalgaard <pda...@gmail.com>; "r-help@r-project.org" 
> <r-help@r-project.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2012 8:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [R] low R square value from ANCOVA model
>
>
>> Thanks again Peter. What about the argument that because low R square (e.g. 
>> R^2=0.2) indicated the model variance was not sufficiently explained by the 
>> factors in the model, there might be additional factors that should be 
>> identified and included in the model. And If these additional factors were 
>> indeed included, it might change the significance for the factor of interest 
>> that previously showed significant coefficient. In other word, if R square 
>> is low, the significant coefficient observed is not trustworthy.
>>
>> What's your opinion on this argument?
>
> I think that argument is silly. I'm sorry if that is too blunt. Its
> just plain superficial.
> It reflects a poor understanding of what the linear model is all
> about. If you have
> other variables that might "belong" in the model, run them and test.
> The R-square,
> either low or high, does not have anything direct to say about whether
> those other
> variables exist.
>
> Here's my authority.
>
> Arthur Goldberger (A Course in Econometrics, 1991, p.177)
> “Nothing in the CR (Classical Regression) model requires that R2 be high. 
> Hence,
> a high R2 is not evidence in favor of the model, and a low R2 is not evidence
> against it.”
>
> I found that reference in Anders Skrondal and  Sophia Rabe-Hesketh,
> Generalized Latend Variable Modeling: Multilevel, Longitudinal,
> and Structural Equation Models, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2004.
>
> From Section 8.5.2:
>
> "Furthermore, how badly the baseline model fits the data depends greatly
> on the magnitude of the parameters of the true model. For instance, consider
> estimating a simple parallel measurement model. If the true model is a
> congeneric measurement model (with considerable variation in factor loadings
> and measurement error variances between items), the fit index could be high
> simply because the null model fits very poorly, i.e. because the
> reliabilities of
> the items are high. However, if the true model is a parallel measurement model
> with low reliabilities the fit index could be low although we are estimating 
> the
> correct model. Similarly, estimating a simple linear regression model can 
> yield
> a high R2 if the relationship is actually quadratic with a considerable linear
> trend and a low R2 when the model is true but with a small slope (relative to
> the overall variance)."
>
> For a detailed argument/explanation of the argument that the R-square is not
> a way to decide if a model is "good" or "bad" see
>
> King, Gary. (1986). How Not to Lie with Statistics: Avoiding Common Mistakes 
> in
> Quantitative Political Science. American Journal of Political Science,
> 30(3), 666–687. doi:10.2307/2111095
>
> pj
> --
> Paul E. Johnson
> Professor, Political Science    Assoc. Director
> 1541 Lilac Lane, Room 504     Center for Research Methods
> University of Kansas               University of Kansas
> http://pj.freefaculty.org            http://quant.ku.edu
>        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>



-- 

Bert Gunter
Genentech Nonclinical Biostatistics

Internal Contact Info:
Phone: 467-7374
Website:
http://pharmadevelopment.roche.com/index/pdb/pdb-functional-groups/pdb-biostatistics/pdb-ncb-home.htm

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to